How does your marketing compare to best in class?


A recent research from Aberdeen about Marketing Asset Management gives an opportunity to compare to the best in class.
Aberdeen uses 3 key performance criteria to compare:

  1. 44% of the sales forecasted pipeline generated by marketing, as compared to 2% contribution for laggards organizations,
  2. An average 9% reduction Year-over-year cost of market asset creation, as compared to a 6% increase among laggards,
  3. 15% average decrease in year-over-year time-to-market of content of all types and formats, as compared to an increase among laggards.

To achieve best in class performance, you need to

  • Allow all geographies and business units to customize marketing content with proper control
  • Centralize asset approval and distribution to expedite time to market and improve content

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s